Continuing care retirement communities · Texas

The Forum at Lincoln Heights

San Antonio, TX · ~200 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Forum at Lincoln Heights runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Forum at Lincoln Heights: 12.9 TCR = 339% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Forum at Lincoln Heights safety composite

The Forum at Lincoln Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

The Forum at Lincoln Heights injury rate improved

The Forum at Lincoln Heights's TCR fell 0.6 from 3.9 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=4.6 · 2020=39.8 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 339% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #200/220
  • PHOTO Belmont Village Memp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Belmont Village Memphis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

The Forum at Lincoln Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Forum at Lincoln Heights averages 12.9 TCR (339% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Forum at Lincoln Heights TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=4.6 · 2020=39.8 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Forum at Lincoln Heights falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 220 Continuing care retirement com employers in Texas.

The Forum at Lincoln Heights (200 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Forum at Lincoln Heights
The Forum at Lincoln Heights (200 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Forum at Lincoln Heights has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2020 39.8 29.4 16 45 0
2018 4.6 1.3 7 0 0
2017 3.9 2.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · San Antonio

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Memphis 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living Lakewood Ranch 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Dracut 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Creek Senior Living 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1400 W LOOP 340, WACO CALL CTR (SS) 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE SI Environmental 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE KIK Underground, LLC 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeldFit Services 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Fox Structures Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-County Child & Family Development Council, Inc. (Head Start) 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wooden Shoe Logistics LLC 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlie's Produce Salt Lake City 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rockland FLooring 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olympus Group Inc 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tifton 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Vernon Township High School 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.