Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing · Ohio

Howmet - Tempcraft

Cleveland, OH · ~214 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howmet - Tempcraft runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Howmet - Tempcraft: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howmet - Tempcraft safety composite

Howmet - Tempcraft scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Howmet - Tempcraft injury rate improved

Howmet - Tempcraft's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/39
  • PHOTO Alaark Tooling and A…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alaark Tooling and Automation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Howmet - Tempcraft in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howmet - Tempcraft averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howmet - Tempcraft TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Howmet - Tempcraft falls in its industry

387 Dies, plastics forming, manufa establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 39 Dies, plastics forming, manufa employers in Ohio.

Howmet - Tempcraft (214 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Howmet - Tempcraft
Howmet - Tempcraft (214 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Howmet - Tempcraft has more employees than the Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · OH · Cleveland

387 Dies, plastics forming, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alaark Tooling and Automation 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.A Eckhart & Associates, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Davis Tool & Die Company Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAIN 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Donley's Inc. 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE N0051 - Doc Solutions Southpark 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teijin Automotive Technologies, Inc. - Conneaut 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Continental Structural Plastics (NB) 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Austin Commercial, LP 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeville Technical Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JDK Services, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big B Crane, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bourbon Community Hospital 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quigley Bus Service, Inc. 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.