Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing · Wisconsin

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC

Hartland, WI · ~214 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC safety composite

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC injury rate improved

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Hartland, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P68
  • PHOTO FTI Flow Technology,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FTI Flow Technology, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC falls in its industry

322 Temperature instruments, indus establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC (214 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC
Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC (214 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co., LLC has more employees than the Temperature instruments, industrial proc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 0 1 0
2022 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 1 1 0
2016 1.4 0.5 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · WI · Hartland

322 Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 61 employers in Hartland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FTI Flow Technology, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Restek Corporation Bellefonte 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA40 PROCESS INSTRUMENTS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viatran 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ledgeview 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meyer Utility Structures 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Pleasant Prairie 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neenah 1515 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR OneTouchPoint - Midwest 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dorner Mfg 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Readycare - Hartland 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Breakthru Beverage 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Cosgrove Construction 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips Reedsville 1 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Keytronic R&A 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Donley's Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Howmet - Tempcraft 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bourbon Community Hospital 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quigley Bus Service, Inc. 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.