Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers · Michigan

H&P Technologies, Inc.

Warren, MI · ~68 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&P Technologies, Inc. runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

H&P Technologies, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 79% of Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&P Technologies, Inc. safety composite

H&P Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

H&P Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

H&P Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Warren, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #17/57
  • PHOTO Gosiger Machine Tool…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC Dayton, OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

H&P Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&P Technologies, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (79% of the Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&P Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=5 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.2

Where H&P Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

911 Industrial machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 57 Industrial machinery and equip employers in Michigan.

H&P Technologies, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate H&P Technologies, Inc.
H&P Technologies, Inc. (68 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

H&P Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Industrial machinery and equipment (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2016 5.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · MI · Warren

911 Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 290 employers in Warren, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC Dayton, OH 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Allen 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Integrated Handling 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cisco Equipment Rentals, LLC - San Angelo 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Lansing 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit Thermal 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Erhardt Construction 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1001 - BELFOR Livonia MI 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Technical Center 22,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Global Technical Center 21,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Truck Assembly Plant 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE
NAT-TCR Adient Greenfield 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Egan Company - Rochester, MN 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Line Building Products 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dorian Studio Sunset 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bridgewater Farms LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russin Lumber Corp 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE JRayl Transport 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guthrie County Courthouse 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.