Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · New York

Russin Lumber Corp

Montgomery, NY · ~68 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Russin Lumber Corp runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Russin Lumber Corp: 2.4 TCR = 108% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Russin Lumber Corp safety composite

Russin Lumber Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Russin Lumber Corp: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

Russin Lumber Corp's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Montgomery, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 108% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #9/29
  • PHOTO Lake County FL Admin
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake County FL Admin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Russin Lumber Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Russin Lumber Corp averages 2.4 TCR (108% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Russin Lumber Corp TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Russin Lumber Corp falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 29 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in New York.

Russin Lumber Corp (68 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Russin Lumber Corp
Russin Lumber Corp (68 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Russin Lumber Corp has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2017 5.4 5.4 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · NY · Montgomery

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 47 employers in Montgomery, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake County FL Admin 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Products-Newton 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conner Industries 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7400 HELENA LBM 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunnyside Farms, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Farms LLC 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE CURTIN DAIRY 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stauffer Farms LLC 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newburgh 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWF1 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR C54 656 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Natural Foods, Inc- Montgomery 576 FTE
NAT-TCR HoneywellLA11 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR True Value Company RDC - Manchester 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OG&E-Seminole PP; EGX Gath/Trans 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SQI Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE JRayl Transport 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&P Technologies, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guthrie County Courthouse 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graycon, Inc. 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.