Airport passenger screening security services · Texas

Hrl Valley International Airport

Harlingen, TX · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hrl Valley International Airport runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade C.

Hrl Valley International Airport: 5.0 TCR = 111% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hrl Valley International Airport safety composite

Hrl Valley International Airport scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hrl Valley International Airport: 0.0 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Hrl Valley International Airport's TCR rose 8.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Harlingen, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 111% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #68/101
  • PHOTO RDU
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RDU (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Hrl Valley International Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hrl Valley International Airport averages 5.0 TCR (111% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hrl Valley International Airport TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=16.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Hrl Valley International Airport falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 101 Airport passenger screening se employers in Texas.

Hrl Valley International Airport (25 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hrl Valley International Airport
Hrl Valley International Airport (25 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Hrl Valley International Airport has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 4.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 16.8 5.6 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Harlingen

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 133 employers in Harlingen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RDU 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730233-MX 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR G1 FACILITY SERVICES INC - BOSTON 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Crestview FL-Eglin AFB (3742) 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms of Monahans 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Feeders, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP 501-508 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-838 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harlingen Medical Center 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX_Harlingen_2921 S. Expswy 83_TCIP2T20 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 595 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Carthage College 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AristaCare at Norwood Terrace 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 08001-08-08-PORTLAND 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Manor Assisted Living Community Vinton 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE MSP Aviation, Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elements Manufacturing Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 916 Sby73 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 811 Tul93 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.