Hazardous waste collection services · Indiana

HT Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HT Indianapolis runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hazardous waste collection services workplace, earning a grade B.

HT Indianapolis: 1.9 TCR = 72% of Hazardous waste collection services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HT Indianapolis safety composite

HT Indianapolis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

HT Indianapolis injury rate improved

HT Indianapolis's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562112 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Enviro…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49AZ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

HT Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HT Indianapolis averages 1.9 TCR (72% of the Hazardous waste collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HT Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=1 · 2018=1 · 2019=2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.6

Where HT Indianapolis falls in its industry

183 Hazardous waste collection ser establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Hazardous waste collection ser employers in Indiana.

HT Indianapolis (85 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HT Indianapolis
HT Indianapolis (85 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 2.8

HT Indianapolis has more employees than the Hazardous waste collection services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.7 4.5 5 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562112 · IN · Indianapolis

183 Hazardous waste collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49AZ 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Earth Specialty Waste Solutions, Tacoma, WA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parlier 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Environmental Logistics, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hendricks Power Headquarters 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 405-NiSource-South Bend IN-Operating HQ 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 530-NiSource-Goshen IN-Operating HQ 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fredericks Inc 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR TOP 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuhns Markets Beulah 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nucor Harris Rebar Northeast LLC (Pawtucket Facility) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oregon Tool - Portland 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE World Class Plastics, Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foti Contracting LLC 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgewater Generating Station 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.