Industry profile · NAICS 562112

Waste hauling, local, hazardous

Workplace injury rates across 130 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

130
Employers
3.7
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
806
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Waste hauling, local, hazardous average 3.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
130
employers reporting
806
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Waste hauling, local, hazardous Safety Data Reveals

The Waste hauling, local, hazardous sector (NAICS 562112) encompasses 130 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 806 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Waste hauling, local, hazardous that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Metro- Solid Waste Operations0 Central Household Hazardous Waste Portland, OR F 27.0
Stericycle - Middletown,CT Middletown, CT F 22.8
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Piscataway,NJ Piscataway, NJ F 13.9
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation SD Spring Valley, CA F 13.0
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation CO Compton, CA F 12.7
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation AZ Phoenix, AZ F 11.8
JF4 Enterprises, Inc. Gustine, CA F 11.8
Norristown Norristown, PA F 10.8
YES Management Inc Yuma, AZ F 10.1
Pacific Trans Environmental Services, Inc. El Cajon, CA F 9.6
First Piedmont Corporation - Danville Chatham, VA F 9.5
Metro Paint- Solid Waster Operations- Latex Paint Recycling Portland, OR F 8.5
Industrial Waste Utilization, Inc. Montclair, CA F 8.3
Clean Earth Environmental Solutions, Inc. Indianapolis, IN F 7.5
Colorado Denver, CO F 7.4
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - San Jose,CA San Jose, CA F 7.3
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49G7 Kent, WA F 7.2
North Central Iowa Regional Solid Waste Agency Fort Dodge, IA F 7.1
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Gary,IN Gary, IN F 7.1
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Orlando,FL Orlando, FL F 7.0
Fremouw Environmental Services Dixon, CA F 7.0
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - 1629Tacoma,WA Tacoma, WA F 6.5
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77BPG Mahopac, NY F 6.5
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49NV Sparks, NV F 6.3
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation Parl Parlier, CA F 6.2
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation cere Modesto, CA F 6.0
San Diego Spring Valley, CA F 6.0
Asbury Environmental Services, d/b/a World Oil Environmental Services, a California corporation cw Compton, CA F 6.0
LEI - Independence 1 Independence, LA F 5.8
Worldwide Recovery Systems Inc Pomona, CA F 5.7
Metro- Solid Waste Operations- South Household Hazardous Waste Oregon City, OR F 5.7
Portland Portland, CT F 5.7
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Washougal,WA Washougal, WA F 5.5
Burlington Environmental LLC Washougal, WA F 5.3
Compton Warehouse Compton, CA F 5.3
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc C1225 Colton, CA F 5.2
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49FW Tualatin, OR F 5.2
Ceres Modesto, CA F 5.2
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 41NH Bow, NH D 5.1
Compton Oaks Compton, CA D 5.1
New Jersey Terminal Freehold, NJ D 5.0
Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Nashville,TN Nashville, TN D 5.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 41ME South Portland, ME D 4.9
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77SAL Salida, CA D 4.9
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77ECO Englewood, CO D 4.7
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77HIG Highland, CA D 4.6
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 29DJ San Jose, CA D 4.5
Ingenium-Santa Clara Santa Clara, CA D 4.5
Clean Harbors Caribe Inc 38F8 Catano, PR D 4.3
S09437 - Enviroserv Gardena Operations Gardena, CA D 4.3
Page 1 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Waste hauling, local, hazardous?

This sector averages 3.7 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.