Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing · Maine

Huber Engineered Woods

Name: Huber Engineered Woods Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Easton, ME · ~135 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huber Engineered Woods runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Huber Engineered Woods: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huber Engineered Woods safety composite

Huber Engineered Woods scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Huber Engineered Woods: 0.6 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2023

Huber Engineered Woods's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.6 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321219 · Easton, ME AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK P62
PHOTO AR107 Fordyce OSB
BOOK 7y book
INJ 17 inj
SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AR107 Fordyce OSB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Spring City Si

1.7
This site

1.6
AR107 Fordyce

1.6
Huebert Fiberb

1.6
Kronospan US20

1.5

What this shows Huber Engineered Woods averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Huber Engineered Woods TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Huber Engineered Woods falls in its industry

125 Oriented strandboard (OSB) man establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Huber Engineered Woods (135 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Huber Engineered Woods has fewer employees than the Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	2.1	1.4	3
2022	0.7	0.0	1
2021	3.9	1.3	6
2020	1.3	0.7	2
2019	0.7	0.0	1
2018	1.9	1.3	3
2017	0.6	0.0	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321219 · ME · Easton

125 Oriented strandboard (OSB) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 3 employers in Easton, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	AR107 Fordyce OSB	FORDYCE, AR	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Huebert Fiberboard Inc.	BOONVILLE, MO	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Spring City Site	SPRING CITY TN, TN	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kronospan US20	EASTABOGA, AL	1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Tilson Technology Management, Inc., Portland, ME	PORTLAND	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2904-SAS-ME	ANY	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	5472-000002550	AUBURN	135 FTE
STATE-SIZE	6462	AUGUSTA	135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	McCains Food Plant#2	Easton	453 FTE
CITY-NEAR	McCain Foods USA, Inc	Easton	396 FTE
NAT-TCR	R21 Lehigh Valley, PA	Nazareth, PA	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	ToyotaLift NE - CIN	Cinnaminson, NJ	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	C & M Dredging, Inc.	Leesburg, FL	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	CAO	Coachella, CA	1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Champion Benton	Benton, KY	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The H.T. Hackney Co.	Milton, FL	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Poly-Med, Inc.	Anderson, SC	135 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Suddath Relocation Systems of Minnesota, LLC	Eden Prairie, MN	135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.