Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · New York

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC

New York, NY · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC: 2.5 TCR = 66% of Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC safety composite

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2022→2024

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC injury rate improved

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.7 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #85/197
  • PHOTO Mercy Health Physici…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mercy Health Physicians MMA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC averages 2.5 TCR (66% of the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC TCR series: 2022=4.7 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC falls in its industry

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 197 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., employers in New York.

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC (173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC
Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC (173 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Hudson Valley Cardiovascular Practice, PC has more employees than the Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 4.7 3.6 4 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NY · New York

2,836 Cardiologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mercy Health Physicians MMA 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phyisician Practices 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Medical Group-743 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olmsted Township Express Care 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kingston 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reale Construction Co.,Inc 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arista 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schenectady 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Marlen International, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Haworth Panels 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hood Container Charlotte 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gardner Inc FL 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Terminal Logistics 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gave Inc. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Master Extrusion 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winn Parish Medical Center 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.