Sanitary food container, folding, made from purchased paperboard · Kentucky

Huhtamaki Folding Carton

Hopkinsville, KY · ~151 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huhtamaki Folding Carton runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sanitary food container, folding, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Huhtamaki Folding Carton: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Sanitary food container, folding, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huhtamaki Folding Carton safety composite

Huhtamaki Folding Carton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Huhtamaki Folding Carton held a steady TCR band

Huhtamaki Folding Carton's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.6 in 2018 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.6 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Hopkinsville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Xenia OH
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Xenia OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Huhtamaki Folding Carton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Huhtamaki Folding Carton averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Sanitary food container, folding, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Huhtamaki Folding Carton TCR series: 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Huhtamaki Folding Carton falls in its industry

205 Sanitary food container, foldi establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Sanitary food container, foldi employers in Kentucky.

Huhtamaki Folding Carton (151 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Huhtamaki Folding Carton
Huhtamaki Folding Carton (151 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Huhtamaki Folding Carton has more employees than the Sanitary food container, folding, made f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · KY · Hopkinsville

205 Sanitary food container, folding, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 132 employers in Hopkinsville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Xenia OH 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nicholasville Folding 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2930 Fresno Fold-Pak 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2335 Harrison Folding 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kelley Construction, Inc. 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSR : Louisville Plant 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Machine and Supply, Inc. - Louisville 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hines Precision Inc. 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jennie Stuart Medical Center 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6066 939 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6066 927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metalsa 840 FTE
NAT-TCR East Texas Radiator 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hub Foundation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenway Equipment Russellville 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Products, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Platinum Crush LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMCom Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acme Manufacturing Company, Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage of Edina 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.