Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Massachusetts

Human Service

Holyoke, MA · ~204 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Human Service runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Human Service: 6.5 TCR = 172% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Human Service safety composite

Human Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Human Service: 3.9 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2022

Human Service's TCR rose 1.3 from 3.9 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Holyoke, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 172% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #25/45
  • PHOTO Community Options La…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~204 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Options Las Cruces NM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Human Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Human Service averages 6.5 TCR (172% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Human Service TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Human Service falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 45 Activity centers for disabled employers in Massachusetts.

Human Service (204 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Human Service
Human Service (204 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Human Service has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 4.1 9 0 0
2021 5.4 3.6 8 1 0
2020 7.7 5.9 13 0 0
2019 10.8 7.9 15 0 0
2018 7.5 5.3 10 0 0
2017 5.3 2.3 7 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MA · Holyoke

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 92 employers in Holyoke, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Options Las Cruces NM 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arc Allegany-Steuben- Shine 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wood Lane Industries 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services for Elderly and Disabled 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Advantage 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Groton 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000002583 204 FTE
STATE-SIZE 012 - Boston 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holyoke Medical Center 1,405 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISO New England Inc. 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DBO7 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Providence Behavioral Hlth Hosp 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Piper Fire Protection Inc Clearwater 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0017-0016-01948 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-04001 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00215 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kirby Foods IGA Plus 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE DECO Products 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens Corning Medina Roofing Plant 204 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsec Austell 204 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.