Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · New York

Human Technologies Syracuse

Syracuse, NY · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Human Technologies Syracuse runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade D.

Human Technologies Syracuse: 4.7 TCR = 125% of Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Human Technologies Syracuse safety composite

Human Technologies Syracuse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Human Technologies Syracuse: 0.0 → 16.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 3.55× in 2024

Human Technologies Syracuse's TCR rose 16.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 16.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 125% of ind

  • DART 16.9 DART
  • RANK #53/88
  • PHOTO Norwood DH
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norwood DH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Human Technologies Syracuse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Human Technologies Syracuse averages 4.7 TCR (125% of the Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Human Technologies Syracuse TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=8.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=16.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Human Technologies Syracuse falls in its industry

1,455 Job training, vocational rehab establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 88 Job training, vocational rehab employers in New York.

Human Technologies Syracuse (36 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Human Technologies Syracuse
Human Technologies Syracuse (36 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Human Technologies Syracuse has fewer employees than the Job training, vocational rehabilitation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.9 16.9 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.8 8.8 1 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · NY · Syracuse

1,455 Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norwood DH 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7000-11029 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Store 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Opportunity Development Centers, Inc - MF 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CY Farms, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry W. Agle and Sons, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Farms, LLC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preble Hill Farms LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Aberdeen Village 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Care Hospital of Montana, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0737 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorain County Automotive Systems 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Spring Grove 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas ProFab Corporation 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden State Bobcat, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carolina 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.