Office furniture (except wood), padded, upholstered, or plain (except wood), manufacturing · New Jersey

Humanscale-Piscataway

Piscataway, NJ · ~358 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Humanscale-Piscataway runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Office furniture (except wood), padded, upholstered, or plain (except wood), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Humanscale-Piscataway: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Office furniture (except wood), padded, upholstered, or plain (except wood), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Humanscale-Piscataway safety composite

Humanscale-Piscataway scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Humanscale-Piscataway held a steady TCR band

Humanscale-Piscataway's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.6 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337214 · Piscataway, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Arete Industries
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~358 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arete Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Humanscale-Piscataway in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Humanscale-Piscataway averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Office furniture (except wood), padded, upholstered, or plain (except wood), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Humanscale-Piscataway TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2019=3 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Humanscale-Piscataway falls in its industry

123 Office furniture (except wood) establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Office furniture (except wood) employers in New Jersey.

Humanscale-Piscataway (358 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Humanscale-Piscataway
Humanscale-Piscataway (358 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Humanscale-Piscataway has more employees than the Office furniture (except wood), padded, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.9 2.6 11 0 0
2021 3.8 3.0 15 0 0
2020 9.9 9.3 10 23 0
2019 3.0 2.2 10 1 0
2018 2.6 2.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337214 · NJ · Piscataway

123 Office furniture (except wood), padded, upholstered, or plain (except wood), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 124 employers in Piscataway, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arete Industries 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Mar02 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hirsh Industries 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1164_2461 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Datascope Corp - Wayne 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJ - Virtual - E 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Remington & Vernick Engineers II 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Virtua - 301 Lippincott Drive 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Technology Center, Colgate - Palmolive 1,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Global Technology Center 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Company 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferraro Foods 733 FTE
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Birmingham 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Case Makes 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HG793 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Y Foods, Inc. Newtown 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blake School (The) Hopkins Campus 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE PPC Broadband Inc. 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE 273784-Jackson Ms P&Dc 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triple S Industrial Corporation 358 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.