Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Oregon

Hunter-Davisson, Inc.

Portland, OR · ~129 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Hunter-Davisson, Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 162% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. safety composite

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hunter-Davisson, Inc.: 2.8 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

Hunter-Davisson, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.1 from 2.8 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 162% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #44/86
  • PHOTO R.E.C. Industries, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.E.C. Industries, Inc. San Antonio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter-Davisson, Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (162% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Hunter-Davisson, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 86 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Oregon.

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. (129 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter-Davisson, Inc.
Hunter-Davisson, Inc. (129 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Hunter-Davisson, Inc. has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 3.5 7 0 0
2023 4.3 2.1 6 0 0
2022 3.9 1.6 5 0 0
2021 3.9 2.3 5 0 0
2020 7.5 6.8 10 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 7 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 6 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 4 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OR · Portland

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.E.C. Industries, Inc. San Antonio 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boyce Comfort Systems, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROBIC REFRIGERATION INC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fireside Madison 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tualatin Valley Water District-HQ 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andersen Construction Company, LLC Portland 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Surimi 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBI 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Newport Pallet Inc, 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fareway Stores, Inc. 073 Council Bluffs 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackburn's Physicians Pharmacy Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE MEDIC Regional Blood Center 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ivan Ware & Son, LLC. 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primetals Alpharetta 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noah Homes, Inc 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.