Nursing homes · North Carolina

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Charlotte, NC · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center: 17.6 TCR = 271% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center: 9.1 → 49.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 49.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 40.0 from 9.1 in 2016 to 49.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 271% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #487/510
  • PHOTO Portland Center for …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portland Center for Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center averages 17.6 TCR (271% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=11.9 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=49.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #487 safest of 510 Nursing homes employers in North Carolina.

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (84 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 49.1 0.0 4 29 0
2019 5.6 0.0 3 1 0
2018 12.3 0.0 9 0 0
2017 11.9 2.6 9 0 0
2016 9.1 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Charlotte

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portland Center for Assisted Living 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Ogden Post Acute 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC Healthcare, Franklin 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAKVIEW MANOR HEALTHCARE & REHAB 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lark Maintenance Facility 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. Corporate Office 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease Charlotte 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Preyde II, LLC. 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tombigbee Electric Power Association 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Micke Farms 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thunderbird Senior Living 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wastewater Treatment of Louisiana 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCarthy-Castle Joint Venture, Tomahawk Creek WWTF 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Division 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Penn Plastic Co., Inc. - LaFayette Division 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.