Skilled nursing facilities · Maine

Portland Center for Assisted Living

Portland, ME · ~83 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Center for Assisted Living runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Portland Center for Assisted Living: 17.6 TCR = 271% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Center for Assisted Living safety composite

Portland Center for Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Portland Center for Assisted Living: 9.5 → 16.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 48.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

Portland Center for Assisted Living's TCR rose 6.8 from 9.5 in 2016 to 16.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 48.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Portland, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.6 · 271% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #104/124
  • PHOTO South Ogden Post Acute
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: South Ogden Post Acute (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Portland Center for Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Center for Assisted Living averages 17.6 TCR (271% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Center for Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2017=10.6 · 2018=25.9 · 2019=8 · 2020=19.6 · 2021=17.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=48.5 · 2024=16.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Portland Center for Assisted Living falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #104 safest of 124 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Maine.

Portland Center for Assisted Living (83 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Center for Assisted Living
Portland Center for Assisted Living (83 employees, TCR 17.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Portland Center for Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.2 5.4 10 5 0
2023 48.5 45.6 34 0 0
2022 2.4 2.2 4 9 0
2021 17.8 17.8 7 1 0
2020 19.6 19.6 3 7 0
2019 8.0 2.7 6 0 0
2018 25.9 13.8 15 0 0
2017 10.6 3.5 6 0 0
2016 9.5 3.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · ME · Portland

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 244 employers in Portland, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR South Ogden Post Acute 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hunterwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC Healthcare, Franklin 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAKVIEW MANOR HEALTHCARE & REHAB 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cianbro Equipment - Pittsfield 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE PNSY 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston MFG 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Formtek Inc 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC 8,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- 22 Bram 5,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Portland 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMP Practices 2,063 FTE
NAT-TCR Public Works 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Valley Landscape & Maintenance, Inc. 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Century II Performing Arts and Convention Center 17.6 TCR
NAT-TCR South Ogden Post Acute 17.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sienna Skilled Nursing and Rehab 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Trucks, LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockford Specialties Company 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bay at Eastview Medical & Rehab. 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.