Planting machinery and equipment, farm-type, merchant wholesalers · Indiana

Huntington

Huntington, IN · ~150 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huntington runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Planting machinery and equipment, farm-type, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Huntington: 4.3 TCR = 197% of Planting machinery and equipment, farm-type, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huntington safety composite

Huntington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2024

Huntington injury rate improved

Huntington's TCR fell 8.6 from 10.8 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.8 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423820 · Huntington, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 197% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #21/28
  • PHOTO WTC - Fort Morgan
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WTC - Fort Morgan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Huntington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Huntington averages 4.3 TCR (197% of the Planting machinery and equipment, farm-type, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Huntington TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Huntington falls in its industry

700 Planting machinery and equipme establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 28 Planting machinery and equipme employers in Indiana.

Huntington (150 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Huntington
Huntington (150 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Huntington has more employees than the Planting machinery and equipment, farm-t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 1.6 4 0 0
2023 4.3 2.4 6 1 0
2022 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2021 4.3 3.3 8 0 0
2020 3.4 1.9 7 0 0
2019 4.2 1.9 11 0 0
2018 2.6 1.3 6 0 0
2017 4.5 0.6 8 0 0
2016 10.8 6.6 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423820 · IN · Huntington

700 Planting machinery and equipment, farm-type, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 59 employers in Huntington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WTC - Fort Morgan 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Location 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SYDENSTRICKER IMPLEMENT-KIRKSVILLE 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torgerson's - Missoula 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Korellis Roofing Inc. 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendallville IN 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harland Clarke Jeffersonville Indiana 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3C, LLC (Hague Rd.) 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teijin Automotive Technologies, INC 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Technologies Electronic Controls, Inc. 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC -Huntington 410 FTE
NAT-TCR Kehm Contractors, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nanuet 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mf Fs 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Asheville 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fiberoptics Technology, Inc. 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Express LLC 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakpointe Senior Care & Rehab Center 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0601 Westfield 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.