Janitorial services · Alabama

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial

Huntsville, AL · ~240 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade D.

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial: 8.5 TCR = 190% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial safety composite

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial: 6.8 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2017

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial's TCR rose 3.4 from 6.8 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Huntsville, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 190% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #65/70
  • PHOTO National Management …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~240 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Management Resources (Faulkner University) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial averages 8.5 TCR (190% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=10.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 70 Janitorial services employers in Alabama.

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial (240 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial
Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial (240 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation - Janitorial has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.2 7.8 21 0 0
2016 6.8 5.9 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AL · Huntsville

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 454 employers in Huntsville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Management Resources (Faulkner University) 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRITTANY MAIDS 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCSAZ - 003 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / FRESH EXPRESS INC. - MORROW 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Energy Homes 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerojet Rocketdyne - AMF North 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Talladega, AL 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyosung USA Inc. 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL004 2,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynetics A Leidos Company 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidos - Dynetics 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg of Alabama 1,874 FTE
NAT-TCR Atrium Post Acute Care of Chetek 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chalet Skilled Nursing Facility 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Indiana ARC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 0747 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE GEHC : Westborough MA, LS 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE League City (Txlci) 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frederick (Mdfre) 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Health Care Center - Sterling Heights 240 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.