Parks and recreation commission, government · Michigan

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority

Brighton, MI · ~326 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade B.

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority: 2.5 TCR = 79% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority safety composite

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2020→2023

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority injury rate improved

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Brighton, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/26
  • PHOTO Orange County - Envi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~326 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orange County - Environment / Agriculture / Parks & Recreation - Parks Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority averages 2.5 TCR (79% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority TCR series: 2020=5.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 26 Parks and recreation commissio employers in Michigan.

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority (326 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority
Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority (326 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority has more employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.1 3.0 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MI · Brighton

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 119 employers in Brighton, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Environment / Agriculture / Parks & Recreation - Parks Division 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Recreation Department 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duluth Fish Hatchery 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Byron Forest Preserve 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chelsea Milling Company 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZF Chassis Components 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2238 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5065 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI-BRIGH01 544 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrightonENA 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI-BRIGH01-Brighton - MI - Warehouse 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR TGFS 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Subaru of Las Vegas 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Energy Systems, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Schenectady Family Health Services 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DFW9 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Andrews Country Club 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raven's Home Production 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockwell Collins (Decorah IA) 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Packaged Meats 326 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.