Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Indiana

Hy-Pro Corporation

Anderson, IN · ~120 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hy-Pro Corporation runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hy-Pro Corporation: 6.9 TCR = 210% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hy-Pro Corporation safety composite

Hy-Pro Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2020

Hy-Pro Corporation injury rate improved

Hy-Pro Corporation's TCR fell 6.6 from 8.6 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=6.8 · 2020=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Anderson, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Trucent Centrifuge P…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trucent Centrifuge Parts and Repair (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hy-Pro Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hy-Pro Corporation averages 6.9 TCR (210% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hy-Pro Corporation TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=6.8 · 2020=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Hy-Pro Corporation falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Indiana.

Hy-Pro Corporation (120 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hy-Pro Corporation
Hy-Pro Corporation (120 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hy-Pro Corporation has more employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.0 0.7 2 1 0
2018 6.8 2.7 7 3 0
2017 10.4 6.9 9 0 0
2016 8.6 1.2 3 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · IN · Anderson

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trucent Centrifuge Parts and Repair 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tomoe Engineering USA, Inc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becon, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR REO Processing Inc 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heartland Growers, Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Plymouth PLY1 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGPI of Indiana, LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited Indianapolis 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Carolina Paper Tubes 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR UVA Medical Center Fontaine 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Robbins Manufacturing, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Del Air Hvac 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meridian Mfg 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Pigeon Forge LLC 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twinbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andover Dr. 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.