General medical and surgical hospitals · Virginia

UVA Medical Center Fontaine

Charlottesville, VA · ~89 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UVA Medical Center Fontaine runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

UVA Medical Center Fontaine: 6.9 TCR = 92% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UVA Medical Center Fontaine safety composite

UVA Medical Center Fontaine scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2018→2020

UVA Medical Center Fontaine injury rate improved

UVA Medical Center Fontaine's TCR fell 7.0 from 11.9 in 2018 to 4.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.9 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Charlottesville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.9 · 92% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #101/129
  • PHOTO PAM Specialty Hospit…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PAM Specialty Hospital Victoria North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

UVA Medical Center Fontaine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UVA Medical Center Fontaine averages 6.9 TCR (92% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UVA Medical Center Fontaine TCR series: 2018=11.9 · 2019=4 · 2020=4.9 · BLS 7.5

Where UVA Medical Center Fontaine falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 129 General medical and surgical h employers in Virginia.

UVA Medical Center Fontaine (89 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate UVA Medical Center Fontaine
UVA Medical Center Fontaine (89 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

UVA Medical Center Fontaine has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2019 4.0 3.2 5 0 0
2018 11.9 8.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · VA · Charlottesville

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PAM Specialty Hospital Victoria North 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UC Medical Center 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Methodist Hosptial Northeast 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 11611600 PMG CAPITAL HILL MAIN BUILDING 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE College Hill Water Treatment Plant 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105085 - Piney Creek Solar 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portsmouth MZB-USA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Lumber Co., Inc. 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Robbins Manufacturing, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hy-Pro Corporation 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Del Air Hvac 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Paper Tubes 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodcraft Industries - Bowling Green 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tandem Products Inc. Blooming Prairie 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. P.O. Box 9898 Amarillo, TX 79101 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE brandywine living at brandall estates 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.