CHESA · Maryland

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina

Cambridge, MD · ~429 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical CHESA workplace, earning a grade F.

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina: 8.0 TCR = 266% of CHESA BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina safety composite

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina: 3.8 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina's TCR rose 5.0 from 3.8 in 2022 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Cambridge, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 266% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #103/126
  • PHOTO Hotel RL Brooklyn
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~429 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hotel RL Brooklyn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina averages 8.0 TCR (266% of the CHESA BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina TCR series: 2022=3.8 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina falls in its industry

9,342 CHESA establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 126 CHESA employers in Maryland.

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina (429 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina (429 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina has more employees than the CHESA median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 4.8 22 0 0
2023 11.3 6.0 33 1 0
2022 3.8 3.1 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MD · Cambridge

9,342 CHESA employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 23 employers in Cambridge, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hotel RL Brooklyn 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4263-15191 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Avatar Hotel 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winter Park Resort 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Columbia 047 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Elevator Inc. 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Salisbury 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2272 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2272 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Shore Hospital Center 196 FTE
NAT-TCR Willert Home Products, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maguire O'Hara Construction 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo King Sales & Service/Sanco Equipment/Sanco Services 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AMI Aviation Services 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Miller Castings, Inc. 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE EVERANA Life Science Services LLC - Mason OH 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE OH_Blue Ash_10920 Kenwood Rd._54520003 429 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSRAM 429 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.