Engineering consulting services · Maryland

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc.

Annapolis Junction, MD · ~428 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering consulting services workplace, earning a grade F.

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 310% of Engineering consulting services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. safety composite

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.8 in 2020 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.8 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Annapolis Junction, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.6 · 310% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #17/23
  • PHOTO Alliant Technologies
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~428 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliant Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (310% of the Engineering consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. TCR series: 2020=1.8 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. falls in its industry

690 Engineering consulting service establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 23 Engineering consulting service employers in Maryland.

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. (428 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc.
Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. (428 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates, Inc. has more employees than the Engineering consulting services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.2 7 0 0
2023 1.3 0.8 6 0 0
2022 1.7 0.9 8 0 0
2020 1.8 1.5 8 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · MD · Annapolis Junction

690 Engineering consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 29 employers in Annapolis Junction, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliant Technologies 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Fond du Lac 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NTA OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineering Center 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delaware Elevator Inc. 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Columbia 047 429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perdue Transportation Incorporated 427 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Golf Resort Spa and Marina 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maryland 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifestar Response of Maryland, Inc. - Annapolis Junction Base 311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US MD Annapolis Junction 410 N (5002) 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR WBA 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Functional Devices, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodgame Company, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stumpy s Tree Service 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR RCI General Engineering, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMS Carolina 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1306 - Los Angeles 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwire Company Kentucky Plant 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems Inc 428 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.