Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · California

Hyatt Regency LAX

Los Angeles, CA · ~260 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hyatt Regency LAX runs at 548% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hyatt Regency LAX: 16.4 TCR = 548% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hyatt Regency LAX safety composite

Hyatt Regency LAX scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2020

Hyatt Regency LAX injury rate improved

Hyatt Regency LAX's TCR fell 0.7 from 16.7 in 2016 to 16.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.7 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=19.8 · 2020=16.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 548% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #1129/1298
  • PHOTO 154 CRESTED BUTTE SU…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 137 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 154 CRESTED BUTTE SUMMER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hyatt Regency LAX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hyatt Regency LAX averages 16.4 TCR (548% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hyatt Regency LAX TCR series: 2016=16.7 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=19.8 · 2020=16 · BLS 3.0

Where Hyatt Regency LAX falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1129 safest of 1298 Hotel management services (i.e employers in California.

Hyatt Regency LAX (260 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hyatt Regency LAX
Hyatt Regency LAX (260 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hyatt Regency LAX has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 16.0 3.2 25 0 0
2018 19.8 1.7 55 4 0
2017 13.2 0.4 32 5 0
2016 16.7 6.6 25 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Los Angeles

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 154 CRESTED BUTTE SUMMER 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn La Mirada 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Resort 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1260 16.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Petroleum California Inc 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHATSWORTH - 15 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Bryant Electric shop 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUJI FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Applewood 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Lutheran Homes and Rehabilitation 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Marshalltown 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZEHR 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Town of Wytheville - 01 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Archdiocese of Chicago-FSP (Food Service Professionals) 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiawatha Community Hospital 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethel Health & Rehabilitation Center, LLC 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.