Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Michigan

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston

Clarkston, MI · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade A.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston: 0.6 TCR = 22% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston safety composite

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 6.02× in 2021

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 6.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Clarkston, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 22% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #14/54
  • PHOTO United Utility - Pow…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Utility - Power Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston averages 0.6 TCR (22% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 54 Construction management, power employers in Michigan.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston
Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston (33 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston has fewer employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Clarkston

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 34 employers in Clarkston, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Utility - Power Services 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Line Service LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louth Callan Renewables LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McKuin Pipeline, Inc, 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRH GROUP LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Svc Ctr 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpena Power Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oscar W. Larson Company (Corporate) 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00651 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Plasics 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00709 133 FTE
NAT-TCR Bellwood Printing Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Transport of Greensboro, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trans Ash, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice : CONYERS 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4769-6218-OUTLETS 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside ConstrcutioN Services Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 001 Main Counter 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsons Residential 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.