Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Louisiana

United Utility - Power Services

New Orleans, LA · ~470 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United Utility - Power Services runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

United Utility - Power Services: 0.6 TCR = 22% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United Utility - Power Services safety composite

United Utility - Power Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2023→2024

United Utility - Power Services injury rate improved

United Utility - Power Services's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.0 in 2023 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.0 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · New Orleans, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO Hydaker-Wheatlake Cl…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~470 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

United Utility - Power Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United Utility - Power Services averages 0.6 TCR (22% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United Utility - Power Services TCR series: 2023=1 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 2.8

Where United Utility - Power Services falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Louisiana.

United Utility - Power Services (470 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate United Utility - Power Services
United Utility - Power Services (470 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

United Utility - Power Services has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2023 1.0 0.6 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · LA · New Orleans

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 450 employers in New Orleans, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake Clarkston 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Line Service LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louth Callan Renewables LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McKuin Pipeline, Inc, 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Teche Vermilion Sugar Cane 470 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Red River Mill 470 FTE
STATE-SIZE Analytic Stress Relieving, LLC 471 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 541 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCMC Health 8,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARAHAN 4,395 FTE
NAT-TCR John Crane Swedesboro 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Emporia Flex Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jesse Stutts Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Terik Roofing Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smoky Mountain Family Farms LLC - Newport TN Farm 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smoky Mountain Family Farms LLC - Midway TN Farm 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tunxis Community College 470 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valero Refining Company - Texas City 470 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.