Aluminum tube made by drawing or extruding purchased aluminum · Washington

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV)

Vancouver, WA · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aluminum tube made by drawing or extruding purchased aluminum workplace, earning a grade A.

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV): 0.6 TCR = 17% of Aluminum tube made by drawing or extruding purchased aluminum BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) safety composite

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2020

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) injury rate improved

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV)'s TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.1 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331318 · Vancouver, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Hydro - Magnolia
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydro - Magnolia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Aluminum tube made by drawing or extruding purchased aluminum BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) TCR series: 2019=1.1 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) falls in its industry

204 Aluminum tube made by drawing establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Aluminum tube made by drawing employers in Washington.

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) (71 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV)
Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) (71 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Hydro Portland Port of Vancouver (POV) has fewer employees than the Aluminum tube made by drawing or extrudi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331318 · WA · Vancouver

204 Aluminum tube made by drawing or extruding purchased aluminum employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 490 employers in Vancouver, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydro - Magnolia 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro City of Industry 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rea Magnet Wire Hanover 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLDCASTLE BUILDING ENVELOPE TERRELL 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Island Dam (Location) 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sabey Corporation 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent 2 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Senior Living 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Medical Center Main Campus 3,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR 600 1,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Cordis a Cardinal Health Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Ansgar Mill 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OTG : Brady 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Health Facilities XIX 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCI All-Size Division 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glatfelter Fort Smith 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 47 Capitola 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.