Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture · California

Hygieia Biological Laboratories

Woodland, CA · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hygieia Biological Laboratories runs at 1980% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture workplace, earning a grade F.

Hygieia Biological Laboratories: 9.9 TCR = 1980% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hygieia Biological Laboratories safety composite

Hygieia Biological Laboratories scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hygieia Biological Laboratories: 6.1 → 19.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 19.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.65× in 2024

Hygieia Biological Laboratories's TCR rose 13.9 from 6.1 in 2017 to 19.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Woodland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 1980% of ind

  • DART 16.3 DART
  • RANK #50/51
  • PHOTO Altasciences Preclin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Altasciences Preclinical Scranton, Inc (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hygieia Biological Laboratories in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hygieia Biological Laboratories averages 9.9 TCR (1980% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hygieia Biological Laboratories TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2018=11.1 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=19.9 · BLS 0.5

Where Hygieia Biological Laboratories falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 51 Biotechnology research and dev employers in California.

Hygieia Biological Laboratories (51 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hygieia Biological Laboratories
Hygieia Biological Laboratories (51 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Hygieia Biological Laboratories has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.9 16.3 11 0 0
2023 7.5 7.5 5 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2018 11.1 5.5 4 0 0
2017 6.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · CA · Woodland

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Altasciences Preclinical Scranton, Inc 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Envigo 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles River Laboratories 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bionetics Corporation 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Domestic Uniform 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Logan UT DI 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Canopy at Warner Robins 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Wing Shoe Co. - SBF Lower 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elroy Health Services 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Builders 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairhaven 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bates Air Conditioning & Svc Co LLC 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.