Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services · Massachusetts

Charles River Laboratories

Shrewsbury, MA · ~438 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles River Laboratories runs at 1622% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Charles River Laboratories: 8.1 TCR = 1622% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles River Laboratories safety composite

Charles River Laboratories scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Charles River Laboratories: 10.4 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

Charles River Laboratories's TCR rose 0.7 from 10.4 in 2019 to 11.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Shrewsbury, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 1622% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #23/23
  • PHOTO Evolved By Nature Wa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 161 inj
  • SIZE ~438 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evolved By Nature Walpole (1.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Charles River Laboratories in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles River Laboratories averages 8.1 TCR (1622% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles River Laboratories TCR series: 2019=10.4 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 0.5

Where Charles River Laboratories falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 23 Biotechnology research and dev employers in Massachusetts.

Charles River Laboratories (438 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles River Laboratories
Charles River Laboratories (438 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Charles River Laboratories has more employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 4.9 29 12 0
2023 7.6 2.8 26 7 0
2022 7.8 1.8 31 4 0
2021 7.2 2.4 30 0 0
2020 4.5 0.6 16 0 0
2019 10.4 5.4 29 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · MA · Shrewsbury

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 57 employers in Shrewsbury, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evolved By Nature Walpole 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hygieia Biological Laboratories 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altasciences Preclinical Scranton, Inc 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DuPont Industrial Sciences 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westford 438 FTE
STATE-SIZE Imprivata, Inc. 438 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England BioLabs, Inc. (Ipswich Headquarters) 437 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Electrical Contractors, Inc. (Columbia Tech) 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR MA-02 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAWOR - WORCESTER 1,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORCESTER (MAWOR) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 249623-CENTRAL MA P&DC 508 FTE
NAT-TCR Denver Cold Storage, Inc Warehouse 2 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Washington Men's Shelter 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mr. Rooter Plumbing 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ShopRite of Warwick 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlottesville - Recreation 438 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sabert Fort Wayne 438 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lonza Bend Inc, 438 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrier Transicold 438 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.