Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · New Hampshire

I C Reed and Sons Inc

Raymond, NH · ~51 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

I C Reed and Sons Inc runs at 274% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.

I C Reed and Sons Inc: 7.7 TCR = 274% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

I C Reed and Sons Inc safety composite

I C Reed and Sons Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2017→2023

I C Reed and Sons Inc injury rate improved

I C Reed and Sons Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 7.9 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=13.9 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Raymond, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 274% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Fisk Communications …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fisk Communications Contracting Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

I C Reed and Sons Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows I C Reed and Sons Inc averages 7.7 TCR (274% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

I C Reed and Sons Inc TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=13.9 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 2.8

Where I C Reed and Sons Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in New Hampshire.

I C Reed and Sons Inc (51 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate I C Reed and Sons Inc
I C Reed and Sons Inc (51 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

I C Reed and Sons Inc has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2021 8.7 7.0 5 0 0
2020 6.4 0.0 4 0 0
2019 13.9 9.9 5 2 0
2018 9.7 7.8 4 1 0
2017 7.9 7.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NH · Raymond

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 14 employers in Raymond, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fisk Communications Contracting Inc 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bullrock Solar LLC 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steiger Construciton, Inc 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ONE WAY WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 663 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3635_6889 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enviro-Tote Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6030 876 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6030 867 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08120 - Store # 8120 Raymond 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8120 181 FTE
NAT-TCR First Class Vending 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerwinds Campbell 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Korfhage Landscape & Designs 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashoba Valley Medical Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Healthcare 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olum's Vestal 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Point O' Woods Golf & Country Club 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.