Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

IAC Fort Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IAC Fort Worth runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

IAC Fort Worth: 5.1 TCR = 113% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IAC Fort Worth safety composite

IAC Fort Worth scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

IAC Fort Worth: 3.0 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.13× in 2021

IAC Fort Worth's TCR rose 7.8 from 3.0 in 2017 to 10.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #71/101
  • PHOTO Constant Aviation- B…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Constant Aviation- BHX, Birmingham International Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

IAC Fort Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IAC Fort Worth averages 5.1 TCR (113% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IAC Fort Worth TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=1.4 · 2021=10.8 · BLS 4.5

Where IAC Fort Worth falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 101 Maintenance and repair service employers in Texas.

IAC Fort Worth (57 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate IAC Fort Worth
IAC Fort Worth (57 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

IAC Fort Worth has fewer employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.8 10.8 4 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 3.0 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Fort Worth

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Constant Aviation- BHX, Birmingham International Airport 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support-Technicair-GRR368T 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AUS-ITP 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730056-MX ORD -CHICAGO, IL - SW 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Pleasant View Communities 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SpecSys Inc Prentice 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR San Carlos 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cobalt Refrigeration Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Temp Heating & A/C Binghamton 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Bloomingdale Police Department 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Depot #9302 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAA Main Office 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.