Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing · Oregon

Ichor Systems - Portland

Name: Ichor Systems - Portland Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tualatin, OR · ~264 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 6.9
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ichor Systems - Portland runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Ichor Systems - Portland: 6.9 TCR = 208% of Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ichor Systems - Portland safety composite

Ichor Systems - Portland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ichor Systems - Portland: 1.1 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 28.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.13× in 2022

Ichor Systems - Portland's TCR rose 1.4 from 1.1 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 28.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Tualatin, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 208% of ind

DART 0.9 DART
RANK P2
PHOTO Orange Research Inc
BOOK 5y book
INJ 23 inj
SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orange Research Inc (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.9
Orange Researc

6.7
JUMO Process C

6.6
H O Trerice Co

6.6
Soil-Max Inc.

6.1

What this shows Ichor Systems - Portland averages 6.9 TCR (208% of the Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Ichor Systems - Portland TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=28.5 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ichor Systems - Portland falls in its industry

322 Instruments for industrial pro establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Ichor Systems - Portland (264 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Ichor Systems - Portland has more employees than the Instruments for industrial process contr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	2.5	0.9	8
2021	28.5	21.4	8
2020	1.3	0.4	3
2019	1.1	0.0	2
2018	1.1	0.5	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · OR · Tualatin

322 Instruments for industrial process control manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 154 employers in Tualatin, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Orange Research Inc	MILFORD, CT	6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	JUMO Process Control, Inc	EAST SYRACUSE, NY	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	H O Trerice Co	OAK PARK, MI	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Soil-Max Inc.	TERRE HAUTE, IN	6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	1419 - Portland East	PORTLAND	264 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Northwest Senior and Disability Services	SALEM	264 FTE
STATE-SIZE	North America : Stayton	STAYTON	263 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2492	PENDLETON	265 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus	Tualatin	2,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR	300	Tualatin	1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6994-PL300	Tualatin	1,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6994-MP	Tualatin	1,111 FTE
NAT-TCR	National Management Resources (University of Mobile)	Mobile, AL	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	CareGivers America LLC Lancaster	Lancaster, PA	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Menomonee Place	Menomonee Falls, WI	6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	G&J Pepsi- Hamilton	Hamilton, OH	6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Gallo Wine Company	Commerce, CA	264 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Menasha Packaging Company - Tobyhanna	Tobyhanna, PA	264 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0121 - El Centro Ca Whse	El Centro, CA	264 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0738 - Cave Creek Az Whse	Phoenix, AZ	264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.