Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing · Oregon

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus

Tualatin, OR · ~2,668 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus safety composite

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus held a steady TCR band

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Tualatin, OR AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO Applied Materials
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 123 inj
  • SIZE ~2,668 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Materials (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus falls in its industry

133 Semiconductor making machinery establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Semiconductor making machinery employers in Oregon.

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus (2,668 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus
Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus (2,668 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Lam Research Corp. Tualatin Campus has more employees than the Semiconductor making machinery manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 8 0 0
2023 0.5 0.4 14 0 0
2022 0.7 0.6 24 0 0
2021 0.7 0.5 21 0 0
2020 0.4 0.2 9 0 0
2018 0.7 0.4 19 0 0
2017 0.8 0.6 19 0 0
2016 0.6 0.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · OR · Tualatin

133 Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 154 employers in Tualatin, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Materials 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORHI02 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTKA01 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MKS Beaverton 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clackamas County 2,454 FTE
STATE-SIZE VAME 2,400 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX9 3,009 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10810010 SUNNYSIDE MEDICAL CENTER SIM LAB 2,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL300 1,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-MP 1,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Foods 549 FTE
NAT-TCR CPAVE, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR L.R. Oliver & Co., Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Geismar 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plano Store #2102 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cargill Protein Dodge City 2,668 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle Mgmt/CS Alaska 2,669 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txdal - Dallas 2,669 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - GRR1 2,666 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.