Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing · Wisconsin

ID Technology-Pewaukee

Pewaukee, WI · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ID Technology-Pewaukee runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

ID Technology-Pewaukee: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ID Technology-Pewaukee safety composite

ID Technology-Pewaukee scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

ID Technology-Pewaukee injury rate improved

ID Technology-Pewaukee's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=8.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Pewaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #25/28
  • PHOTO Airport
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

ID Technology-Pewaukee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ID Technology-Pewaukee averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ID Technology-Pewaukee TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=8.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where ID Technology-Pewaukee falls in its industry

269 Labeling (i.e., packaging) mac establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 28 Labeling (i.e., packaging) mac employers in Wisconsin.

ID Technology-Pewaukee (44 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate ID Technology-Pewaukee
ID Technology-Pewaukee (44 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

ID Technology-Pewaukee has fewer employees than the Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 6.6 6.6 3 0 0
2021 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 8.8 2.9 3 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · WI · Pewaukee

269 Labeling (i.e., packaging) machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pewaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Airport 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProMach Filling Systems, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Tissue Packaging, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cozzoli Machine Company 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crave Brothers Farm 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee South Shore 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARC Contracting of Wisconsin Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR CORPORATE 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEWAUKEE WI 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWI1 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOTAL MECHANICAL, Inc 268 FTE
NAT-TCR Hollister Service Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitesell Corporation - Gargis Lane 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hundley Farms Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wastequip Brookhaven 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guyer Brothers, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health - Kapolei HI 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller Electric Construction, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tex-L 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.