Hotels (except casino hotels) · Georgia

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging)

Fort Benning, GA · ~109 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging): 7.1 TCR = 237% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) safety composite

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2023→2024

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) injury rate improved

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging)'s TCR fell 9.6 from 11.9 in 2023 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=11.9 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Fort Benning, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 237% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #252/326
  • PHOTO Custer State Park
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custer State Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) averages 7.1 TCR (237% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) TCR series: 2023=11.9 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.0

Where IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #252 safest of 326 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Georgia.

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) (109 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging)
IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) (109 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

IHG Army Hotels - Fort Moore (Army Lodging) has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 11.9 11.9 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · GA · Fort Benning

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 17 employers in Fort Benning, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custer State Park 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark Bend, LLC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn Marriott Milpitas 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester Marriott Mayo Clinic Area 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Satilla REMC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Atlanta 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Southern LNG 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Lines Construction Services 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Benning GA (GA0544) 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Benning LRC GA0544 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR APTIM Goverment Services DPW 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benning DPW 160 FTE
NAT-TCR World Class Plastics, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elmhurst Park Distirct 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Prince of Peace 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Millers Merry Manor 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone Quality Transport Company - NE Base 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vanguard BR 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Tool - KC Blades 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recology Western Oregon 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.