Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturing · Tennessee

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee

Mount Pleasant, TN · ~379 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee safety composite

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2021

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee injury rate improved

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee's TCR fell 2.9 from 3.6 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332510 · Mount Pleasant, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Mar-K
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mar-K (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee falls in its industry

189 Automobile hardware, metal, ma establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Automobile hardware, metal, ma employers in Tennessee.

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee (379 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee
Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee (379 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee has more employees than the Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 10 0 0
2018 3.5 2.4 13 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 16 0 0
2016 3.6 2.1 18 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332510 · TN · Mount Pleasant

189 Automobile hardware, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mount Pleasant, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mar-K 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Brands, HHI Denison 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RWM Casters 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards Equipment Sales, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE K07 ICT - Tullahoma 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 304 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE 674 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE 578 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR UST, dba Landmark Ceramics 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fuel Total Systems, TN 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sekisui Plastics USA Inc. Plant 2 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Fonua Construction LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tom Tanenbaum, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vala Holdings L.L.C. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North Alabama Pipe 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catalinos Berry Farms, LLC 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0146 - Livermore Ca Whse 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0063 - Northeast Anchorage Ak Whse 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Safe 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.