Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) · Tennessee

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC

Mount Pleasant, TN · ~98 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) workplace, earning a grade D.

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC: 4.6 TCR = 140% of Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC safety composite

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2022→2024

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC injury rate improved

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.4 in 2022 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.4 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Mount Pleasant, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 140% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Trialco
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trialco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC averages 4.6 TCR (140% of the Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC TCR series: 2022=7.4 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC falls in its industry

103 Aluminum smelting, secondary, establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Aluminum smelting, secondary, employers in Tennessee.

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC (98 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC
Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC (98 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Tennessee Aluminum Processors, INC has more employees than the Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2023 4.3 3.3 4 0 0
2022 7.4 5.6 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · TN · Mount Pleasant

103 Aluminum smelting, secondary, and making ingot and billet (except by rolling) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mount Pleasant, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trialco 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Real Alloy Recycling, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scepter Inc.- Waverly Operations 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyal America, Inc 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction Co. - Nashville Region 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.C. Mathews Contractor, LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA TN Memphis 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Foundation Drilling Co. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Imasen Bucyrus Technologies, Inc of Tennessee 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR UST, dba Landmark Ceramics 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fuel Total Systems, TN 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sekisui Plastics USA Inc. Plant 2 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Met-L-Tec LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 5365 - South Boulevard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne's Foods Plus-Webster 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kessler's Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Displaycraft Inc 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Sacramento 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake in the Hills 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pemberton Davis Electric 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.