Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Imperial Dade North Carolina

Greensboro, NC · ~56 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Imperial Dade North Carolina runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Imperial Dade North Carolina: 2.8 TCR = 128% of Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Imperial Dade North Carolina safety composite

Imperial Dade North Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Imperial Dade North Carolina: 1.6 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.79× in 2018

Imperial Dade North Carolina's TCR rose 3.5 from 1.6 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 128% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Victory Packaging De…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Victory Packaging Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Imperial Dade North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Imperial Dade North Carolina averages 2.8 TCR (128% of the Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Imperial Dade North Carolina TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=5 · BLS 2.2

Where Imperial Dade North Carolina falls in its industry

290 Bags, paper and disposable pla establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Bags, paper and disposable pla employers in North Carolina.

Imperial Dade North Carolina (56 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Imperial Dade North Carolina
Imperial Dade North Carolina (56 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Imperial Dade North Carolina has more employees than the Bags, paper and disposable plastics, mer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · NC · Greensboro

290 Bags, paper and disposable plastics, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging Detroit 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - FL278 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victory Packaging San Antonio 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Box Partners WH 2 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Tri-State 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siler City Hatchery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Rose & Sons, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roanoke Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen Place - Orland Park 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McPherson T & M 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Albert Lea (Mnalb) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln (Nelin) 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE APCO 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garrity Tool Company, LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Bardstown II 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omaha South 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.