Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical · Arkansas

Independent Case Management

Little Rock, AR · ~479 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Independent Case Management runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical workplace, earning a grade A.

Independent Case Management: 0.8 TCR = 22% of Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Independent Case Management safety composite

Independent Case Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Independent Case Management held a steady TCR band

Independent Case Management's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Little Rock, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #4/26
  • PHOTO CCSI-Homewood
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~479 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCSI-Homewood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Independent Case Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Independent Case Management averages 0.8 TCR (22% of the Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Independent Case Management TCR series: 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Independent Case Management falls in its industry

1,320 Homemaker's service for elderl establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 26 Homemaker's service for elderl employers in Arkansas.

Independent Case Management (479 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Independent Case Management
Independent Case Management (479 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Independent Case Management has more employees than the Homemaker's service for elderly or disab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.3 3 2 0
2021 0.7 0.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · AR · Little Rock

1,320 Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCSI-Homewood 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TheKey - GA, Atlanta (4600 Roswell Rd.) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo (W700) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Future Fuel Chemical Company 477 FTE
STATE-SIZE 045131-LITTLE ROCK AR P&DC 477 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2587 476 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fayetteville AR (Plant) 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR EAC 6295 Cold River Materials 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Univ of Vt Davis Market 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trient LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Socal Pacific Construction Corp. dba National Coating Lining Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spotlight 29 Casino 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Beverage Group 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Columbia 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE U Tec Construction Inc 479 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.