Day care centers, adult · New York

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)

Lackawanna, NY · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Day care centers, adult workplace, earning a grade A.

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): 0.8 TCR = 22% of Day care centers, adult BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) safety composite

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 4.02× in 2019

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)'s TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 4.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Lackawanna, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 22% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #7/158
  • PHOTO TheKey - GA, Atlanta…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TheKey - GA, Atlanta (4600 Roswell Rd.) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) averages 0.8 TCR (22% of the Day care centers, adult BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers, adult establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 158 Day care centers, adult employers in New York.

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) (32 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)
Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) (32 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Program All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) has fewer employees than the Day care centers, adult median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Lackawanna

1,320 Day care centers, adult employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 41 employers in Lackawanna, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TheKey - GA, Atlanta (4600 Roswell Rd.) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo (W700) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Developmental Intellectual Division 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Minnesota Independent Living Enterprises & Services 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schofield Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Bliss 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1482 West Genesee Road, Baldwinsville NY 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 166 Gary Dr., Brockport, NY 14420 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Time Release Sciences Inc. 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 790 Ridge Road 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR 790-BVS-790 RIDGE ROAD 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR HM Buffalo 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Allen Medical Systems, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IMI Precison Engineering 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-MD/PA District : SVC-Baltimore MD-USA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI Lewiston 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn Scottsdale 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE KWF GA Kennesaw HomeStore 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08-TTCO-DOTHAN 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4113-41131003-R23 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.