Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing · Minnesota

Independent Technologies, Inc.

New London, MN · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Independent Technologies, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Independent Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Independent Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Independent Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Independent Technologies, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Independent Technologies, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334210 · New London, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO Westell Inc Aurora
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westell Inc Aurora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Independent Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Independent Technologies, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Independent Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Independent Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

42 Carrier equipment (i.e., analo establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Carrier equipment (i.e., analo employers in Minnesota.

Independent Technologies, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 28 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 29 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Independent Technologies, Inc.
Independent Technologies, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 28 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Independent Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334210 · MN · New London

42 Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in New London, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westell Inc Aurora 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA Ofc Lorain 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fujitsu Network Communications 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex LLC, Optical Solutions, Downers Grove 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR New London-Spicer Schools 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmer Bus Service of New London-Spicer, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of New London 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prairie Woods Elementary 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE America's Grow-A-Row Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire Center-Missoula South 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA Foods_Ft Lauderdale 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackfoot, ID 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.