Child welfare services · Indiana

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County

Bloomington, IN · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Child welfare services workplace, earning a grade C.

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Child welfare services BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County safety composite

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County: 0.0 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2022

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County's TCR rose 7.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 7.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · Bloomington, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #24/35
  • PHOTO Lane County Youth Se…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lane County Youth Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Child welfare services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County falls in its industry

328 Child welfare services establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 35 Child welfare services employers in Indiana.

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County (54 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County
Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County (54 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County has fewer employees than the Child welfare services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · IN · Bloomington

328 Child welfare services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 204 employers in Bloomington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lane County Youth Services 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Mosaic Project 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 327 - LaCrosse Youth 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Indianapolis 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore TC Service Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark County REMC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 800-DREES-INDIANAPOLIS 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Incorporated Park 48 3,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Inc 2,976 FTE
CITY-NEAR CI-P48 2,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington 2,251 FTE
NAT-TCR North Gateway Recycling 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Giant #527 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trajen Flight Support LP - IAH 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hca-Mountainview_hospital Es 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG548 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG582 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auditor-Controller's Office 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster Elementary 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.