Adoption services, child · California

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley

Lancaster, CA · ~149 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Adoption services, child workplace, earning a grade C.

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley: 3.9 TCR = 103% of Adoption services, child BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley safety composite

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2021→2024

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley injury rate improved

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley's TCR fell 8.9 from 10.8 in 2021 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.8 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #24/53
  • PHOTO Lane County Youth Se…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lane County Youth Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley averages 3.9 TCR (103% of the Adoption services, child BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley TCR series: 2021=10.8 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley falls in its industry

328 Adoption services, child establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 53 Adoption services, child employers in California.

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley (149 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley
Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley (149 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Penny Lane Centers Antelope Valley has more employees than the Adoption services, child median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.7 3 0 0
2023 2.2 1.1 3 1 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 10.8 0.0 0 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · CA · Lancaster

328 Adoption services, child employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lane County Youth Services 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Department of Child Services - Clinton County 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Department of Child Services - Monroe County 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penny Lane Centers North Hills 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Berry Farms Inc 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Artzai, LLC 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pattern Energy Group Inc 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE EASTERN CONSTRUCT/FLD SRVC-1 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR New Horizons Lanier Park 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher59- Denton 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Belleville 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Sound Radiology 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ruggable Charlotte 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Teledyne Marine Systems 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Oil Industries, Savannah 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE CED Main 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.