Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Indiana

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc

Indianapolis, IN · ~420 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc: 4.2 TCR = 56% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc safety composite

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2021

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc injury rate improved

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.1 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #79/198
  • PHOTO Mount Carmel St. Ann…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~420 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mount Carmel St. Ann's Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indiana University Health Saxony Inc averages 4.2 TCR (56% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Indiana University Health Saxony Inc falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 198 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Indiana.

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc (420 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Indiana University Health Saxony Inc
Indiana University Health Saxony Inc (420 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Indiana University Health Saxony Inc has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 0.5 2 6 0
2020 4.8 1.1 6 7 0
2019 4.1 1.2 3 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · IN · Indianapolis

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mount Carmel St. Ann's Hospital 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covington - AMG Rehabilitation 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1855-ALBIR29 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTEGRIS Grove Hospital 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Herff Jones 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE Castleton Square 598 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN001 - IN-Gary-Operating Center 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE 160-DC001 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Maine Machine Products Company 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National Heat Exchange 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Joliet TownePlace Suites 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Live Turkey - Dayton VA Hatchery 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeland Hospital Niles 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vermont Regional Office 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humana Pharmacy 1 420 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.