Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions · Alabama

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies

Cullman, AL · ~420 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions workplace, earning a grade B.

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies: 3.1 TCR = 58% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies safety composite

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies: 2.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2020

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies's TCR rose 1.0 from 2.0 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Cullman, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO GKN Bowling Green
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~420 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GKN Bowling Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies averages 3.1 TCR (58% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=3 · BLS 5.4

Where Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies falls in its industry

320 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Alabama.

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies (420 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies
Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies (420 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies has more employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.0 1.5 9 1 0
2019 4.5 4.3 20 0 0
2018 2.0 1.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · AL · Cullman

320 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 98 employers in Cullman, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GKN Bowling Green 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZF Chassis Systems-Duncan 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magna Powertrain 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tyler Union Anniston 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loxley Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 420 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reliable Products 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE ZHUN/358 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cullman 1,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6006 1,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6006 1,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rehau Auto Cullman 1,008 FTE
NAT-TCR Tioga Community Care Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Schmid Mechanical 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-MA-Norwell-Washington Street 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meridian Brick-Elgin Plant-2 Meridian 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health Saxony Inc 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeland Hospital Niles 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vermont Regional Office 420 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humana Pharmacy 1 420 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.