Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Indiana

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS)

Indianapolis, IN · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade A.

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS): 0.6 TCR = 24% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS): 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.98× in 2021

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 24% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Integrated Protectio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Integrated Protection Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) averages 0.6 TCR (24% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) (42 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS)
Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) (42 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Indianapolis FS (SSS, CSS) has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · IN · Indianapolis

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Integrated Protection Services 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lacey FS (SSS,CSS) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone Mountain FS (SSS, CSS) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denver - 350 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benton Dairy LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orange County REMC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-States Construction Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 44361e - Lakeland Fl Pec 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Hooksett, NH 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Femco, Inc. , # 20, Corporate Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Omega Rigging & Machinery Moving 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston FS (SSS, CSS) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyramid Masonry Contractors, FL 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta Sash & Door 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gem Auto Parts Co, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.