General Automotive Repair and Office Duties · Indiana

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT

Indianapolis, IN · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Automotive Repair and Office Duties workplace, earning a grade B.

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT: 2.8 TCR = 61% of General Automotive Repair and Office Duties BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT safety composite

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/125
  • PHOTO Ashley Pacific North…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ashley Pacific North West - California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT averages 2.8 TCR (61% of the General Automotive Repair and Office Duties BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT falls in its industry

3,252 General Automotive Repair and establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 125 General Automotive Repair and employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT (31 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT
Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT (31 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT has fewer employees than the General Automotive Repair and Office Dut median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · IN · Indianapolis

3,252 General Automotive Repair and Office Duties employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ashley Pacific North West - California 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6868 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairchild Freight LLC - Grandview, Washington 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poway, CA - 12775 Stowe Drive 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - INW 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Pullet Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitestown, IN 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Service Center 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-Savannah 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-Jacksonville 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4596 Yuba City. CA 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1062 TULSA, OK 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TUS-6614) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern States Loudoun County Coop 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Nursery - Newark 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.