Freight Transportation Arrangement · Florida

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343)

Orlando, FL · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Freight Transportation Arrangement workplace, earning a grade A.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343): 0.4 TCR = 9% of Freight Transportation Arrangement BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) held a steady TCR band

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488510 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/25
  • PHOTO Trinity Logistics, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trinity Logistics, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) averages 0.4 TCR (9% of the Freight Transportation Arrangement BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) falls in its industry

358 Freight Transportation Arrange establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 25 Freight Transportation Arrange employers in Florida.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) (31 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ORL-6343) has fewer employees than the Freight Transportation Arrangement median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488510 · FL · Orlando

358 Freight Transportation Arrangement employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trinity Logistics, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Span Alaska - Auburn 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA - Miami, Doral 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR EWR Branch 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Ag LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wedgworth Farms, Inc Farms Shop 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fwest 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2406-Felda, FL 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Valmet Lansdale 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RefleXion Medical, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - New Jersey 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Phoenix 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TUS-6614) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Corrections (16) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0698 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Terminal-NON DOT 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.