General Automotive Repair and Office Duties · Indiana

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT

Indianapolis, IN · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Automotive Repair and Office Duties workplace, earning a grade A.

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT: 1.0 TCR = 22% of General Automotive Repair and Office Duties BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT safety composite

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.99× in 2021

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #7/125
  • PHOTO Midway, GA - Sunbury…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Midway, GA - Sunbury Rd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the General Automotive Repair and Office Duties BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT falls in its industry

3,252 General Automotive Repair and establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 125 General Automotive Repair and employers in Indiana.

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT
Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Indianapolis Terminal - NON DOT has fewer employees than the General Automotive Repair and Office Dut median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · IN · Indianapolis

3,252 General Automotive Repair and Office Duties employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Midway, GA - Sunbury Rd 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR E. Brunswick, NJ - Edgeboro Rd 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Breinigsville, PA - Willard Dr 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEDICATED LOGISTICS LLC 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 118-NiSource-Hammond IN-CISC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heartland REMC - Markle District 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 220-NiSource-Gary IN-GM&T 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardizzone Enterprises Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal - NON DOT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckley Newspapers Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hobart College-Housekeeping 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Instrumentation : Huntsville 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodland Oilseeds 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Ind - NW Ohio Navarre Retail Store 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klemm Tank Lines 53012 Madison 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-987-West Elm 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.